|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Next Text:
Notes on Filmosophy: A Reply to Reviews, New Review of Film
and Television Studies, forthcoming December 2008. Film and
Philosophy conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 20-22 November 2008. Emergent
Encounters with Film Theory, King's College London conference on
philosophical and psychoanalytical perspectives on film, March 2009 [info here] Filmosophy put
forward by Columbia UP for the Society for Cinema and Media Studies Katherine
Singer Kovacs Book Award 2008 Filmosophy
selected as a Choice Outstanding Academic Title 2007 Latest
reviews: 'Daniel
FramptonÕs work Filmosophy can be considered one of
the most recent analyses of Gilles DeleuzeÕs theories on cinema, especially
in its relationship to philosophy. But FramptonÕs book is more than that. It
goes beyond the French philosopher in its argument that film, analogous to
philosophy can be regarded not simply as an art form but as thinking itself, a
system of thoughts, ideas and memories. . . . Frampton suggests that what we
see is not only an image or character, but also the filmÕs own ÔbeliefÕ in
and about this image or character. By disclosing this filmic belief, FramptonÕs
concept of filmosophy tries to regenerate the connection between the audience
and the film, subsequently reconnecting us with the real world. . . .
FramptonÕs work offers an interesting new approach in discussing cinema in a
wider context. It not only provides an excellent overview of philosophical
film theories, but offers a perspective for looking at the relevance of
cinema for our life and thinking beyond mere escapism.' --- Sylvie
Magerstdt, Review
of Filmosophy, Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture,
vol. 5 no. 3, September 2008. 'Filmosophy
is bursting with energy and revolutionary zeal. But it is also more tempered
than one might expect. If it has an edge of dogmatism, it is slightly ironic.
Its refutations of other approaches are more scholarly than vitriolic. And
while its assertions are often righteous, they are coupled with a palpable
and inspiring belief in the possibilities of Þlm, thinking about Þlm,
and thinking through Þlm, that promises to revitalise original and innovative
Þlm investigation.' --- Lisa
Trahair, 'Film Theory', The Year's
Work in Critical and Cultural Theory, 2008. 'Immensely
rewarding and stimulating. The spirit of the book is one which reminds me of
the great soothsayers of modern painting – Apollinaire, Kandinsky,
Kokoschka, Marinetti, Malevich and others – and it is little wonder
that Frampton relies on many writers of the 1920s who pulsated with the
future promise of cinema: Dulac, Epstein, Eisenstein, Balazs. There is indeed
a future promise in Filmosophy: that the future of cinema is
alive and well, and some of us are awaiting its thoughts with excited
anticipation.' --- Richard
Rushton, Review of Filmosophy, Screen,
vol. 49 no. 2, Summer 2008. 'Daniel
FramptonÕs remarkable Filmosophy is a book
that squarely confronts the question: how should we speak about film? What kind
of philosophical writing does justice to the experience of cinema? Frampton
cuts through the Gordian knot of contemporary film debates concerning
'subjective' versus 'objective' forms of the image, authorial intention,
auteurism, apparatus theory, narratology, cognitive problem-solving, and so
on. One should salute FramptonÕs achievement: Filmosophy
elaborates a strikingly original conceptualization of film experience which
also synthesizes much of the history of philosophical reflection on the
cinema.' --- Robert Sinnerbrink (Macquarie University), Review of Filmosophy, Projections: The Journal for
Movies and Mind, vol. 1 no. 2, 2008. 'A passionate and earnest Ôcall-to-armsÕ regarding the state
of film studies, Daniel FramptonÕs Filmosophy (2006) is a highly ambitious
book. . . . FramptonÕs work argues that film is a radically unique art form,
which is able to ÔthinkÕ its own world. Part of FramptonÕs project is to
propose a new vocabulary with which we can apprehend cinema: one which will
allow us to talk about, write about, and experience the world of film in a
way that cognitivist discourse has previously stifled. . . . FramptonÕs
thought-provoking book is refreshing in its attempts to re-conceptualise the
way in which we consider the visual image, and is passionate in its belief
that cinema and visual culture has been poorly used. . . . Frampton argues
that our understanding of our relationship to the image is woefully
incomplete, and that we should see film as formulating its own philosophy: we
should see film as a kind of future thinking.' --- Alexia Bowler, Review of Filmosophy,
New
Cinemas, vol. 6 no. 1, 2008. * Filmosophy is a provocative manifesto for a radically philosophical way
of understanding cinema. The book coalesces twentieth-century ideas of film
as thought (from Mnsterberg to Deleuze) into a practical theory of
'film-thinking', arguing that film style conveys poetic ideas through a
constant dramatic 'intent' about the characters, spaces, and events of film.
With discussions of contemporary filmmakers such as Bla Tarr, Michael
Haneke, and the Dardennes, this bold intervention into the study of film and
philosophy will stir argument and discussion among both filmgoers and
filmmakers alike. --- London: Wallflower Press, 2006 | ISBN 1-904764-84-3
(pbk) £15.00 | 1-904764-85-1 (hbk) £45.00 | 256 pp. Info: Book Contents, Introduction, Wallflower Press, Columbia University Press, Review
Copies Cherwell,
Choice, Communication Booknotes Quarterly, Contemporary Magazine, Ekran,
Empire, De Filmkrant, Forum for Modern Language Studies, Frieze, Illuminace,
Projections, Scope, Screen, Senses of Cinema, Sight & Sound, Vertigo. Ian Christie,
Tom Conley, Colin Davis, Harmony Korine, Colin McGinn, Adrian Martin, Martha
P. Nochimson, Geoffrey Nowell-Smith, D. N. Rodowick, Dan Shaw, Vivian
Sobchack, Emma Wilson, George M. Wilson Translations Mohammad
Shahb's Persian translation of an early version of the Introduction
(2001) * Club
Filmosophy 28 April
2008, Claire
Denis's The Intruder, Roxy, London (in association with Tartan Video)
– with guest speaker Laura McMahon (Cambridge University) 27 March
2008: Haneke's Hidden, BFI Southbank, London 26
Feb 2008: Medem's The Red Squirrel, Roxy, London
– with guest speaker Jo Evans
(University College London) 26
Nov 2007: Haneke's 71 Fragments of a Chrology of Chance,
Roxy, London – with guest speaker David Sorfa
(Liverpool John Moores University) 11
October 2007: Apichatpong's Syndromes and a Century, BFI
Southbank, London 10
Sept 2007: von Trier's Europa, Roxy, London 21
June 2007: Lynch's Inland Empire, BFI Southbank, London Talks 6 July 2008:
Roundtable discussion, Film/Philosophy conference, Bristol 26 June 2008:
BFI
Education Media Studies Conference, London 6 May 2008: Talk/Interview,
St Anne's
College, Oxford 2 Feb 2008:
Talk & Seminar, Univeriteit van Amsterdam, Netherlands 10 Sept 2007:
Introduction to Filmosophy, Roxy, London 15 Oct 2006: Conversation with Harmony Korine, Renoir,
London (Press comment here) 28 Sept 2006:
What is Filmosophy?, Panel discussion (Jonathan Romney, Geoffrey
Nowell-Smith, Jonathan Ree) & Book launch, London Review
Bookshop, London [Read a report on the evening here] 2001:
Filmosophy: An Introduction, Wadham College, Oxford Texts Forthcoming
– Filmosophy Book Launch Discussion at the London
Review Bookshop Forthcoming
– Filmosophical Cinema: On Lynch's Inland Empire Forthcoming
– Notes on Filmosophy: A Reply to Reviews, New Review of Film and
Television Studies, forthcoming 2008. I am a Camera
[on Harmony Korine], Tank
Magazine, 2007. A Filmosophy
of the Dardennes, Vertigo,
vol. 3 no. 3, Autumn 2006. Moving Images, The Guardian, 23 October 2006
– republished in Discover... Mass Media (Schoningh
Press, forthcoming 2009). Introduction, Filmosophy (2006). The Way that Movements Speak,
Film-Philosophy, vol. 5 no. 10, 2001. Filmosophy:
Colour, in MacCabe & Petrie, eds, Working Papers from the BFI
(London: BFI, 1996). Lars
von Trier x 6 (1993). On
Deleuze's Cinema (1991). * Discuss
Filmosophy at Film-Philosophy * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filmosophyš is a registered U.S. trademark
owned by Valentin Stoilov (www.filmosophy.com) for educational services in
the field of motion picture history, theory, and production. Mr. Stoilov is
not the source or origin of this book and has not sponsored or endorsed it or
its author. |